Motives of Social Entrepreneurship in the EU’s Education and Enlightenment Field | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2021. № 54. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/54/15

Motives of Social Entrepreneurship in the EU’s Education and Enlightenment Field

This study examines the motives (reasons) of social entrepreneurship in the field of education and enlightenment of the European Union. We used the methodology of collective case study to answer the research questions. Our final sample includes seven social enterprises which work at different levels (from European to local) and in different EU countries. We identified the following motives of social entrepreneurship in the field of education in the EU: 1) the desire to change society; 2) self-realization; 3) networking; 4) personal life situation; 5) access to funding and grant support. These motives in general (without details) are identical to the well-known motives of social entrepreneurship. A detailed analysis of the motives of social entrepreneurship in the field of education and enlightenment of the EU allowed us to identify its distinctive features (that are determined by the field of activity), namely: the motive to change society by means of education and art; the motive of self-realization by means of the acquisition or implementation of professional experience in the field of education and enlightenment; the motive of networking by means of the inclusion of educational institutions, students, pupils, teachers; the motive of networking by means of the involvement of children and youth as key participants and volunteers; personal life situation as a motive was often associated with obtaining education and new knowledge in difficult socioeconomic circumstances in the past. The studied social enterprises belong to the EU that has an influence on the studied motives: the desire to change society by means of education and introduction of the European Union’s fundamental values; the motive of state funding and grant support by means of access to the European funds. This study has its limitations being a collective case of seven non-profit organizations engaged in social and entrepreneurial activities in the field of education and enlightenment. These organizations operate at different levels (from European to local), but the case does not cover all the EU countries and at the same time does not show the specifics of particular countries that may become directions for future research. This study also has limitations imposed by the qualitative approach methodology. The obtained results can be used to conduct a quantitative study in the future with a survey of social entrepreneurs in the field of education and enlightenment in the EU. *The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the content which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Download file
Counter downloads: 36

Keywords

social entrepreneurship, motives, education, European Union

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Fomina Yulia A.Dostoevsky Omsk State Universityfomina-u-a@yandex.ru
Katunina Irina V.Dostoevsky Omsk State Universityi.v.katunina@gmail.com
Всего: 2

References

Monzon J.L., Chaves R. The Social Economy in the European Union. (Report). Brussel : European Economic and Social Committee, 2020. URL: www.eesc.europa.eu (date of access: 22.12.2020).
Social economy in the EU / Social economy // An official website of the European Union. 2020. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social-economy_en (date of access: 22.12.2020).
Social Economy Europe. 2020. URL: http://www.socialeconomy.eu.org/ (date of access: 22.12.2020).
Volunteering in the European Union // Educational, Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency (EAC-EA). Final Report submitted by GHK. London, 2010.
UK Civil Society Almanac // How many people volunteer and what do they do? 2019. URL: https://data.ncvo.org.uk/volunteering/(date of access: 22.12.2020).
European Social Fund. 2020. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/esf/main.jsp?catId= 62&langId=en (date of access: 22.12.2020).
Chahine T. Introduction to Social Entrepreneurship. CRC Press: Boca Raton, 2016.
Doherty B., Haugh H., Lyon F. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda // International journal of management reviews. 2014. № 16 (4). Р. 417-436.
Pache A.C., Santos F. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics // Academy of Management Journal. 2012. № 56. Р. 9721001.
Davies I.A., Doherty B. Balancing a Hybrid Business Model: The Search for Equilibrium at Cafedirect // Journal of Business Ethics. 2019. № 157. Р. 1043-1066.
Alter S.K. Social enterprise: A typology of the field contextualized in Latin America. Working Paper. Washington D.C., 2003.
Dees J.G. A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Ethics. 2012. № 111 (3). Р. 321-334.
Austin J., Stevenson H., Wei-Skillern J. Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2006. № 30 (1). Р. 1-22.
Ghalwash S., Tolba A., Ismail A. What motivates social entrepreneurs to start social ventures? An exploratory study in the context of a developing economy // Social Enterprise Journal. 2017. № 13 (3). Р. 268-298.
Hockerts K. The Effect of Experiential Social Entrepreneurship Education on Intention Formation in Students // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2018. № 9 (3). Р. 234-256.
Thomsen B., Muurlink O., Best T. Backpack Bootstrapping: Social Entrepreneurship Education Through Experiential Learning // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2019. № 10 (3).
Zhu Y., Rooney D., Phillips N. Practice-based wisdom theory for integrating institutional logics: A new model for social entrepreneurship learning and education // Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2016. № 15 (3). Р. 607-625.
Schlee P.R., Curren M.T., Harich K.R. Building a marketing curriculum to support courses in social entrepreneurship and social venture competitions // Journal of Marketing Education. 2009. № 31 (1). Р. 5-15.
Smith K. Embedding enterprise education into the curriculum at a researchled university // Education and Training. 2008. № 50 (8-9). Р. 713-724.
Melnikova J. Leading complementary schools as non-profit social entrepreneurship: Cases from Lithuania // Management in Education. 2020. № 34 (4). Р. 149-156.
Germak A.J., Robinson J.A. Exploring the Motivation of Nascent Social Entrepreneurs // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2014. № 5 (1). Р. 5-21.
Baierl R., Grichnik D., Sporrle M., Welpe I.M. Antecedents of Social Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Role of an Individual's General Social Appraisal // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2014. № 5 (2). Р. 123-145.
Dufays F., Huybrechts B. Connecting the Dots for Social Value: A Review on Social Networks and Social Entrepreneurship // Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2014. № 5:2. Р. 214-237.
Lubberink R., Blok, Ophem V.J., Omta O. Responsible innovation by social entrepreneurs: an exploratory study of values integration in innovations // Journal of Responsible Innovation. 2019. № 6:2. Р. 179-210.
Pacut A. Drivers toward Social Entrepreneurs Engagement in Poland: An Institutional Approach // Administrative sciences. 2020. № 10 (1). Р. 5.
Mair J., Noboa E. Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture get formed // Social entrepreneurship / ed. by J. Mair, J. Robinson, K. Hockerts. N.Y. : Palgrave MacMillan, 2006. Р. 121-136.
Fomina Y., Chahine T. Social Entrepreneurship Factors of Success and Failure in the Omsk Region of Russia // Responsible People. The Role of the Individual in CSR, Entrepreneurship and Management Education / ed. by F. Farache, G. Grigore, A. Stancu, D. McQueen. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Р. 89-111.
Patton M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 2015.
Short J., Todd W.M., Lumpkin G. Research in Social Entrepreneurship: Past Contributions and Future Opportunities // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. 2009. № 3. Р. 161-194.
Saebi T., Foss N.J., Linder S. Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises // Journal of Management. 2019. Vol. 45, № 1. Р. 70-95.
Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Applied social research methods series. Thousand Oaks, California : Sage Publications, Inc., 2014.
Grima-Farrell C. The Collective Case Study Design: Comparing Six Research to Practice Case Studies // What Matters in a Research to Practice Cycle? Singapore : Springer, 2017.
Eriksson P., Kovalainen A. Qualitative Methods in Business Research. London : Sage, 2008.
Social Economy Enterprises. 2020. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social-economy/enterprises_en (date of access: 22.12.2020).
Social Economy. 2020. URL: https://www.socialeconomy.eu.org/about/(date of access: 22.12.2020).
Denzin N.K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. N. Y. : McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? // Qualitative Research. 2006. Vol. 6, № 1.
Clarke V., Braun V., Hayfield N. Thematic analysis // Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. 2015. Р. 222-248.
 Motives of Social Entrepreneurship in the EU’s Education and Enlightenment Field | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2021. № 54. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/54/15

Motives of Social Entrepreneurship in the EU’s Education and Enlightenment Field | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2021. № 54. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/54/15

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 864