Analysis of the Labour Productivity Impact on Indicators of Economic Growth at the National, Sub-Federal, and Regional Levels | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2021. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/55/12

Analysis of the Labour Productivity Impact on Indicators of Economic Growth at the National, Sub-Federal, and Regional Levels

Labour productivity has a predominant impact on economic growth and the rate of postcrisis economic recovery. The increase in labour productivity, in turn, depends on the employed population’s standard of living. A comparative longitude analysis of these indicators’ dynamics reveals the potential for the economic growth of the territory. The historically determined asymmetry in the economic development of Russian regions requires analysis carried out at the national, sub-federal (federal districts), and regional levels. In the study, the author evaluates the dynamics of the per capita gross regional product (GRP), labour productivity, and real wages in constant prices at purchasing power parity for Russia, the Siberian Federal District, and Krasnoyarsk Krai. The results of this analysis allow comparing economic growth and labour productivity growth in Russia and Russian regions with international trends. The author has found that labour productivity per working hour measured in constant prices in Russia, Siberia, and Krasnoyarsk Krai is several times lower than the corresponding indicators of countries leading in productivity and economic growth. The dynamics of per capita GRP and labour productivity, measured both in current and constant prices, is positive. The statistical relationship between labour productivity growth and cyclical processes in the national economy is noted; in the crisis and post-crisis periods, there is outstripping growth in labour productivity due to the mobilization of the workers’ labour potential. The economy of the Siberian Federal District has been characterized by a steady excess of the growth rate of labour productivity over the growth rate of per capita GRP, while in Krasnoyarsk Krai and Russia this trend has manifested since 2014 with the onset of the crisis. This process indicates a change in the mechanisms of economic growth: with the entry into the crisis phase, human labour, as well as its efficiency, becomes the only significant factor in maintaining the stability of national and regional economies. The obtained results also show the depressive impact of a long-term decline in real wages on labour productivity and economic growth during the economic crisis. The structural analysis demonstrates that labour productivity growth has a strong positive effect on economic growth, while the growth of the employment rate has a moderate positive effect. A decline in the share of the working-age population in the demographic structure has a pronounced negative impact on economic growth in the long-term period. The study results can be used in the development of national and regional policies related to stimulating economic growth.

Download file
Counter downloads: 59

Keywords

economic growth, labour productivity, regional economy, structure analysis, dynamics analysis

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Samusenko Svetlana A.Siberian Federal Universitysv_sam@bk.ru; ssamusenko@sfu-kras.ru
Всего: 1

References

Шкиотов С.В., Маркин М.И. Верификация взаимосвязи между уровнем национальной конкурентоспособности, качеством жизни населения и производительностью труда на примере развитых стран мира // Научный журнал НИУ ИТМО. Серия «Экономика и экологический менеджмент». 2018. № 2. С. 57-65.
Auzina-Emsina A. Labour productivity, economic growth, and global competitiveness in post-crisis period // Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. № 156. P. 317-321.
Ahrend R. Russian industrial restructuring: Trends in productivity, competitiveness and comparative advantage // Post-Communist Economies. 2006. № 18. P. 277-295.
OECD Economic Outlook. 2018. Is. 2. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2018. 284 p. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_outlook-v2018-2-en (дата обращения: 07.10.2020).
Лавровский Б.Л. Тенденции производительности в мире и России // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2015. № 3. С. 104-113.
Лавровский Б.Л. Российские регионы в системе мировых трендов производительности труда // Регион: экономика и социология. 2017. № 3 (95). С. 50-68.
Михеева Н.Н. Региональные аспекты исследования динамики производительности труда // Регион: экономика и социология. 2014. № 1 (81). С. 6-28.
Михеева Н.Н. Сравнительный анализ производительности труда в российских регионах // Регион: экономика и социология. 2015. № 2 (86). С. 86-112.
Буфетова А.Н. Пространственные аспекты динамики производительности труда в России // Мир экономики и управления. 2017. Т. 17, № 4. С. 142-157.
Korkmaz S., Korkmaz O. The Relationship between Labor Productivity and Economic Growth in OECD Countries // International Journal of Economics and Finance. 2017. Vol. 9, № 5. P. 71-76. DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v9n5p71
Feenstra R.C., Inklaar R., Timmer M.P. The Next Generation of the Penn World Table // American Economic Review. 2015. № 105 (10). P. 3150-3182. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20130954
Зайцев А.А. Душевой ВВП и производительность труда в России: было ли догоняющее развитие? // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2014. № 4. С. 33-50.
Зайцев А.А. Межстрановые различия в производительности труда: роль капитала, уровня технологий и природной ренты // Вопросы экономики. 2016. № 9. С. 67-93.
Cobet A., Wilson G. Comparing 50 years of labor productivity in US and foreign manufacturing // Monthly Labor Review. 2002. June. P. 51-65.
Timmer M.P., O’Mahony M., van Ark B. EU KLEMS growth and productivity accounts: an overview // International Productivity Monitor. 2007. Vol. 14. P. 71.
Timmer M.P., Inklaar R., O’Mahony M., van Ark B. Economic Growth in Europe: A Comparative Industry Perspective. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511762703
Производительность труда в Российской Федерации: Социальный бюллетень / Аналитический центр при Правительстве РФ. 2017. URL: http://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/13612.pdf (дата обращения: 25.10.2020).
Воскобойников И.Б., Гимпельсон В.Е. Рост производительности труда, структурные сдвиги и неформальная занятость в российской экономике // Вопросы экономики. 2015. № 11. С. 30-61.
Спасская О.В. Макроэкономические методы исследования и измерения структурных изменений // Научные труды / Институт народнохозяйственного прогнозирования РАН. 2003. Т. 1. С. 20-39.
 Analysis of the Labour Productivity Impact on Indicators of Economic Growth at the National, Sub-Federal, and Regional Levels | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2021. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/55/12

Analysis of the Labour Productivity Impact on Indicators of Economic Growth at the National, Sub-Federal, and Regional Levels | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2021. № 55. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/55/12

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 287