The impact of sociocultural factors on demonstrative consumption: A theoretical analysis
The article explores the influence of sociocultural factors on demonstrative consumption based on Hofstede's methodology. The aim of the article is to analyze theoretically the impact of the main informal institutions on the behavior of consumers of luxury goods and to identify the most characteristic features of demonstrative consumption for certain types of cultures. The article uses the methodology of institutional and cross-cultural analysis, comparative and statistical methods. The study of demonstrative consumption in different types of cultures was carried out according to Hofstede's six parameters: power distance, individualism - collectivism, masculinity - femininity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation to the future, indulgence -restraint. The study proves that consumer behavior based on the desire to demonstrate status is most characteristic of collectivistic masculine cultures with a high level of power distance, uncertainty avoidance and long-term orientation to the future. In indulgent cultures, compared to restrained ones, people are more likely to buy luxury brands in order to satisfy utilitarian and hedonistic needs. A study of the institutional aspects of luxury consumption in countries with different types of cultures revealed the main characteristics of the influence of sociocultural factors on demonstrative consumption. This study will allow marketers to determine the psychological aspects of consumer behavior from different types of cultures in relation to luxury brands.
Keywords
culture,
luxury goods,
conspicuous consumption,
luxury brands,
power distance,
individualism,
collectivismAuthors
Strizhak Anna Yu. | Donetsk National University | strizak.a86@mail.ru |
Mancheva Inessa K. | Donetsk National University | i.mancheva@donnu.ru |
Всего: 2
References
Bernstein Research European luxury goods: Long-term attractiveness & structural demand drivers. Business source complete. N.Y. : Bernstein Global Wealth Management, 2010.
Chen G.M., Chung J. The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication // Communication Quarterly. 1994. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 93-105.
Chandrasekara R., Wijetunga D. Tension between values of traditional and consumerist cultures in a Sri Lankan context: A self-discrepancy perspective // Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2016. Vol. 28, № 5. P. 309-322.
Dubois D., Jung S.J., Ordabayeva N. The psychology of luxury consumption // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 39. P. 82-87.
Kapferer J.N., Laurent G. Where do consumers think luxury begins? A study of perceived minimum price for 21 luxury goods in 7 countries // Journal of Business Research. 2016. Vol. 69, № 1. P. 332-340.
Song Y., Li C., Pancras J. The demonstration effect of consumption across cities in China: evidence from the automobile market // Emerging Markets and the Future of the BRIC Nations. 2015. P. 143-169.
Stathopoulou A., Balabanis G. The effect of cultural value orientation on consumers' perceptions of luxury value and proclivity for luxury consumption // Journal of Business Research. 2019. Vol. 102. P. 298-312.
Андреева А.Н., Богомолова Л.Н. Маркетинг роскоши: современные стратегии. СПб. : Изд-во СПбГУП, 2007. 336 с.
Воля Е.В. Престижное потребление как фактор развития мирового рынка предметов роскоши // Terra Economicus. 2008. Т. 6, № 4-3. С. 33-36.
Ростовцева Л.И., Цимерман Ю.А. Региональные особенности демонстративного потребления в современной России // Социально-экономические и инновационные проблемы региона : материалы Всероссийской научно-практической конференции. Самара, 2005. С. 58-61.
Ченчик А.В. Портрет современного потребителя товаров класса люкс (роскоши) // Российское предпринимательство. 2018. Т. 19, № 4. С. 1315-1322.
Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. Clarendon Press, 1739. 338 p.
Smith A. The Wealth of Nations (1776). URL: https://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/The%20Wealth%20of%20Nations.pdf (дата обращения: 14.03.2022).
Nurkse R. Some international aspects of the problem of economic development // The American economic review. 1952. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 571-583.
Herrick B., Kindleberger C. Economic Development. N.Y. : McGraw-Hill, 1984. Vol. 4. 542 p.
James J. Positional goods, conspicuous consumption and the international demonstration effect reconsidered // World Development. 1987. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 449-462.
Ruvio A. Unique like everybody else? The dual role of consumers' need for uniqueness // Psychology & Marketing. 2008. Vol. 25, № 5. P. 444-464.
Le N.T.C., Quy V.T. Personal values of luxury services consumption: A Confucian culture perspective // Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2020. Vol. 32, № 4. P. 300-312.
Hofstede G. The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories // Journal of international business studies. 1983. Vol. 14, № 2. P. 75-89.
Hofstede G., Bond M.H. Hofstede's culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's value survey // Journal of cross-cultural psychology. 1984. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 417-433.
Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind : Mc Graw Hill, 2010. 561 p.
Sharif K., Kassim N.M. Luxury consumption behavior of Muslim customers in a culturally distinct and an affluent market // Islamic perspectives on marketing and consumer behavior: Planning, implementation, and control. 2015. P. 193-213.
Wilcox K., Kim H.M., Sen S. Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands // Journal of marketing research. 2009. Vol. 46, № 2. P. 247-259.
Jiang L., Gao H., Shi L.H. The effect of power distance beliefs on the inconspicuous versus conspicuous consumption of luxury accessories in China and the USA // Journal of Marketing Management. 2021. Vol. 37, № 15-16. P. 1459-1489.
Yan J., Kim Y., Kim S. Perceived Conspicuous Consumption and Brand Evaluation: Mediation Effect of Power Distance Belief // Journal of Service Research and Studies. 2017. Vol. 7, № 4. P. 1-14.
Gokcekus O., Suzuki Y. Is there a corruption-effect on conspicuous consumption? // Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2014. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 215-235.
Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J. Cultures and organizations: software for the mind. London : McGraw-Hill, 2004. 576 p.
Donthu N., Yoo B. Cultural influences on service quality expectations // Journal of service research. 1998. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 178-186.
Dhar R., Wertenbroch K. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods // Journal of marketing research. 2000. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 60-71.
Tynan C., McKechnie S., Chhuon C. Co-creating value for luxury brands // Journal of business research. 2010. Vol. 63, № 11. P. 1156-1163.
Shukla P. Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: Measuring interfunctional interactions and a cross-national comparison // Journal of world business. 2011. Vol. 46, № 2. P. 242-252.
Bao Y., Zhou K.Z., Su C. Face consciousness and risk aversion: do they affect consumer decision-making? // Psychology & Marketing. 2003. Vol. 20, № 8. P. 733-755.
Kaufmann H.R., Vrontis D., Manakova Y. Perception of luxury: Idiosyncratic Russian consumer culture and identity // European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management. 2012. Vol. 2, № 3-4. P. 209-235.
Peshkova A., Urkmez T. Wagner R. Symbolic consumption of luxury: an example of luxury fashion goods in Russia // Marketing and Consumer Behavior. Strategica. 2015. P. 677-685.
De Barnier V., Rodina I., Valette-Florence P. Which luxury perceptions affect most consumer purchase behavior? A cross-cultural exploratory study in France, the United Kingdom and Russia // Proceedings des Congres Paris-Venise des Tendences Marketing, Paris. 2006. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 8-17.
Liao J., Wang L. Face as a mediator of the relationship between material value and brand consciousness // Psychology & Marketing. 2009. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 987-1001.
Kamal S., Chu S.C., Pedram M. Materialism, attitudes, and social media usage and their impact on purchase intention of luxury fashion goods among American and Arab young generations // Journal of Interactive Advertising. 2013. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 27-40.
Kim J.H., Zhang B. Attitude and purchase intent for luxury fashion goods: Cultural differences between Americans and Chinese // International Journal of Costume and Fashion. 2015. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 19-37.
Eagly A.H. Sex differences in sexual behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987. 190 p.
Berger J., Heath C. Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2008. Vol. 95, № 3. P. 593-607.
Roux E., Tafani E., Vigneron F. Values associated with luxury brand consumption and the role of gender // Journal of Business Research. 2017. Vol. 71. P. 102-113.
Андреева А.Н. Маркетинг роскоши: анализ современных концепций // Бренд-менеджмент. 2014. № 4. С. 194-216.
Зарецкий Е.В. «Фемининность» русской культуры: лингвистический аспект // Acta linguistica. 2014. Т. 8, № 3. С. 3-78.
De Mooij M. Consumer Behavior and Culture. Consequences for Global Marketing and Advertising Sage Publications : Sage Publications, 2004. 360 p.
Benli B., Ferman M. The effect of cultural dimensions on conspicuous consumption and online compulsive buying behavior: a comparative study among Turkish and American consumers // Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics. 2019. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 103127.
Marcus A., Gould E.W. Cultural dimensions and global web design: What? So what? Now what // Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web. 2001. URL: http://www.www.amanda.com/resources/hfweb2000/AMA_CultDim.pdf. (дата обращения: 13.03.2022).
De Mooij M. Global Marketing and Advertising: Understanding Cultural Paradoxes. Sage, 2010. 416 p.
Asamoah E.S., Chovancova M. The effect of cultural orientation on the purchasing decisions of consumers: a cross cultural comparative study // International Journal of Contemporary Management. 2016. № 15 (1). P. 7-32.
Eng T.Y., Bogaert J. Psychological and cultural insights into consumption of luxury western brands in India // Journal of Customer Behaviour. 2010. Vol. 9, № 1. P. 55-75.