Sustainability 5.0: From value transformation to digital technology management and social change
The relevance of the research is determined by the need to find effective solutions for ensuring sustainable development by leveraging the potential of digital technologies, amidst growing social and environmental problems that threaten the wellbeing of modern society. The aim of this research is to examine the features of the "Sustainability 5.0" concept in relation to ensuring the sustainable development of national economies, as well as to substantiate a toolkit for state policy that facilitates sustainable social changes based on the governance of digital technologies. The research objectives involve formulating a conceptual approach to ensuring sustainable social changes in accordance with the "Sustainability 5.0" concept; investigating the experience of various countries in integrating sustainability into their value systems, behavioral models, and the governance of digital development; and substantiating priority areas for state policy that can initiate sustainable social changes. Research methods include: content analysis of national strategies and programs in the field of sustainable and digital development, economic analysis, comparative analysis, logical method, graphical method, and a systems approach. The scientific novelty of the research lies in expanding the theoretical and methodological basis for ensuring sustainable social changes through the use of digital technologies' potential to address social and environmental challenges at the current stage of development. The authors formulated a conceptual approach to ensuring sustainable social changes and substantiated their determinants in accordance with the principles of Sustainability 5.0. A comprehensive analysis of the sustainable development policies implemented in Finland, Sweden, and Russia was conducted. It was established that the leading countries in sustainable development clearly follow the logic of initiating sustainable social changes in their decisions (changing values, altering behavioral models, orienting applied digital technologies towards solving social and environmental tasks). Strategic benchmarks for Russia's sustainable development were identified. Authors' contribution: B. O. Khashir - corresponding author, development of the theoretical base of the study, selection of the literature, substantiation of the conclusions. E.A. Gatina - formation of the methodological foundations of the study, formulation of the scientific hypothesis, setting of the aim and objectives of the study, preparation of the conclusions. A.A. Chudaeva - data processing through systematization and economic and statistical analysis. E. V. Fedotova - presentation of illustrative material, data analysis, comparative analysis, formation of recommendations. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
Keywords
Sustainability 5.0,
sustainable development,
digital technologies,
sustainable social change,
public policyAuthors
| Khashir Bella O. | Kuban State Technological University | mskhashir@mail.ru |
| Gatina Elvira A. | Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University | gatina_ea@mail.ru |
| Chudaeva Alexandra A. | Samara State University of Economics | chudaeva@inbox.ru |
| Fedotova Elena V. | Kaluga Branch of the Russian State Agrarian University named after K.A. Timiryazev | elenaf1972@yandex.ru |
Всего: 4
References
Karpunina E.K., Kosorukova I.V., Dubovitski A.A., Galieva G.F., Chernenko E.M. State policy of transition to society 5.0: Identification and assessment of digitalisation risks // International Journal of Public Law and Policy. 2021. Vol. 7, № 4. Р. 334-350.
Matsuoka H., Hirai C. Habitat innovation // Society 5.0: A People-Centric Super-Smart Society / Hitachi-U Tokyo Laboratory (Ed.). Singapore : Springer, 2020. P. 25-42.
Yin C., Zhao W., Fu B., Meadows M.E., Pereira P. Key axes of global progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023. Vol. 385. 135767.
Deguchi A., Hirai C., Matsuoka H., Nakano T., Oshima K., Tai M., Tani S. What is a Society 5.0? // Society 5.0: A People-Centric Super-Smart Society / Hitachi-U Tokyo Laboratory (Ed.). Singapore : Springer, 2020. P. 21-23.
Karpunina E., Kharchenko E., Mikhailov A., Nedorezova E., Khorev A. From digital development of economy to Society 5.0: Why we should remember about security risks? // Proceedings of the 34th IbIMA conference. Madrid, Spain, 2019. P. 3678-3688.
Кохно П., Кохно А., Ситников С. Показатели и модели оценки эффективности государственного финансирования исследований и разработок // Общество и экономика. 2017. № 5. C. 39-70.
Демидова Е.Е. Особенности цифровизации стран Скандинавского региона // Проблемы деятельности ученого и научных коллективов. 2018. Т. 4, № 34. С. 191-199.
Brynjolfsson E. The digital economy, GDP and consumer welfare: Theory and evidence // ESCoE Conference on Economic Measurement. Bank of England, 2018. P. 16-17.
Карпунина Е.К., Коновалова М.Е. Инвестируя в НИОКР, формируем будущее: сравнительный анализ по странам БРИКС и ОЭСР // Друкеровский вестник. 2021. № 1 (39). С. 65-76.
Исламутдинов В.Ф. Инстигуциональные изменения в контексте цифровой экономики // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2020. № 12 (3). С. 142-156.
Санникова Т.Д. Институциональные и ресурсные ограничения на пути решения задачи перехода к цифровой экономике // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2019. № 9 (3). С. 633-646.
Пономарев С.В., Усанов А.Ю., Покаместов И.Е., Кузьменко Н.И. Цифровое развитие хозяйственных систем стран БРИКС // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. Серия: Политические, социологические и экономические науки. 2024. Т. 9, № 4 (34). С. 598-609.
Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda // The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2019. Vol. 28 (2). P. 118-144.
Kochyan G.A., Borshchevskaya E.P., Ponomarev S.V., Magomaeva L.R., Lavrikova N.I. Assessing the digital divide in OECD and BRICS countries: Implications for public policy // International Journal of Technology, Policy & Management. 2024. Vol. 24 (3). P. 285-302.
Matli W., Malatji M. A review of Internet use and access for BRICS sustainable futures: Opportunities, benefits, and challenges // Journal of Information Systems and Informatics. 2024. Vol. 6 (1). P. 435-452.
Vakarev А.А., Medvedeva L.N. Sustainability of the real economy of the regions of Russia through the predicted future of cities // Друкеровский вестник. 2020. № 4. C. 181192.
Hojnik J., Ruzzier M., Manolova T. Eco-innovation and firm efficiency: Empirical evidence from Slovenia // foresight and STI Governance. 2017. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 103-111.
Хашир Б.О., Яковлева Е.А., Лубова Т.Н., Адлина Т.В. Социально-экономическое благополучие человека в условиях воздействия экологических угроз // Вестник Сургутского государственного университета. 2023. Т. 11, № 3. С. 82-95.
Rume T., Islam D. Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability // Heliyon. 2020. Vol. 6 (9). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965.
Nomura A. Toward smart urban development based on user-driven innovation: Smart city 2.0 initiatives // Japan Research Institute Review. 2017. Vol. 8, № 47. P. 101-139.
United Nations. Rankings. The overall performance of all 193 UN Member States. URL: https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/rankings.
Europa. What is Industry 5.0? URL: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-areindustrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en.
Современные подходы к обеспечению экономической безопасности государства и регионов в эру неопределенности / под ред. Е.К. Карпуниной. М. : Русайнс, 2022.
Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk // Econometrica. 1979. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 263-292.
Isaeva E.A., Materova E.S., Galieva G.F., Gatina E.A., Sobolevskaya T.G. Pandemic and sanctions: A study of economic shocks in the Russian economy // Ecological footprint of the Modern Economy and the Ways to Reduce It. The Role of Leading Technologies and Responsible Innovations. Cham: Springer, 2024. P. 445-451.
Хашир Б.О., Швецова И.Н., Усанов А.Ю., Пономарев С.В. Специфика цифровизации в России и регионах в условиях неопределенности // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. Серия: Политические, социологические и экономические науки. 2023. Т. 8, № 2 (28). С. 249-258.
Intermin.fi. Government budget proposal for 2023 secures purchasing power, compensates price hike in electricity and strengthens conditions for sustainable growth. URL: https://intermin.fi/en/-/10616/government-budget-proposal-for-2023-secures-purchasing-power-compensates-price-hike-in-electricity-and-strengthens-conditions-for-sustainable-growth.
Valtioneuvosto.fi. General Government Fiscal Plan for 2023-2026: Policies to safeguard Finland’s future, sustainable growth and security. URL: https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/-/general-government-fiscal-plan-for-2023-2026-policies-to-safeguard-finland-s-future-sus tainable-growth-and-security.
Undp. Finland Contributes EUR 2 Million To UNDP, Supporting Global Sustainable Development. URL: https://www.undp.org/news/fmland-contributes-eur-2-million-undp-sup poing-global-sustainable-development.
Europa. Education and Training Monitor 2024. Finland. URL: https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eac/educatioand-training-monitor/en/country-reports/finland.html.
Europeansting Sweden: SEK 22 billion in EIB financing provided for firms and municipalities in 2024. URL: https://europeansting.com/2025/02/25/sweden-sek-22-billion-in-eib-financing-provided-for-firms-and-municipalities-in-2024/.
Digitalfutures.kth. Industry 4.0 and beyond - towards Industry 5.0 by driving sustainability through digitalization. URL: https://www.digitalfutures.kth.se/project/industry-4-0-and-beyond-towards-industry-5-0-by-driving-sustainability-through-digitalization/.
Consultant. Ста. 74. Экологическое просвещение. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34823/31cbdcc572222c93a51fed78205b68b35c0d8fe0/.
Roscongress. Национальный проект «Экология»: приоритета: государства, возможности для бизнеса. URL: https://roscongress.org/sessions/eef-2018-natsionalnyy-proekt-ekologiya-prioritety-gosudarstva-vozmozhnosti-dlya-biznesa/translation/.
Путинцева Н.А., Чекалин В.С. Обзор мер по организации управления отходами в России, как фактора повышения ее энергоэффективности // Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного экономического университета. 2018. № 4 (112). С. 68-74.
Обзор: Экология - от осознания к действию. URL: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/2405078/cms-pdfs/fileadmin/user_upload/dyna_content/ru/documents/press_releases/2019/gfk_rus_press_release_ecology_review.pdf.
Podorova-Anikina O.N., Karpunina E.K., Gukasyan Z.O., Nazarchuk N.P., Perekatieva T.A. E-commerce market: Intensification of development during the pandemic // Imitation Market Modeling in Digital Economy: Game Theoretic Approaches. Cham : Springer, 2022. P. 363-373.
Карпунина Е.К., Губернаторова Н.Н., Соболевская Т.Г. Эффекта: пандемии Covid-19: новые паттерна: потребительского поведения // Вестник Северо-Кавказского федерального университета. 2022. № 1 (88). С. 63-76.
СоциоДиггер. Ежегодник ВЦИОМ. Т. 2. М. : ВЦИОМ, 2022. 736 с.
Росстат. Уровень жизни. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/13397#.
Plyasova S.V., Bondareva N.A., Titova E.V., Stash Z.N., Karpunina E.K. Risks of the shared consumption economy in Russia and the European Union countries // Imitation Market Modeling in Digital Economy: Game Theoretic Approaches. Cham : Springer, 2022. P. 750-761.
Президент России. Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 07.05.2024 г. № 309.
