Media as an expert system and an area of trust | Voprosy zhurnalistiki – Russian Journal of Media Studies. 2017. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/26188422/1/2

Media as an expert system and an area of trust

Mass media activity should be considered not only as informing the audience, but also as establishing trust between the editorial offices and the public. It is about rational trust in the media as an expert system that organises our information environment and partly our social environment. Anthony Giddens studied trust in expert systems, but the phenomenon of trust in the press has not been studied much, although sociologists have measured attitudes to different social institutions for decades, including trust in the media. Today, the level of trust in institutions in Russia is generally low, but trust in media (in 2017, 32 percent, according to the Edelman Institute) is at one of the lowest levels in comparison with similar indicators in other countries. The fall of trust is one of the reasons for the systemic crisis of journalism. The distrustful attitude of the audience towards the media largely explains the place, role and prospects of media in Russian society, as well as the disoriented state of the society itself. We are dealing with a double-thinking person demonstrating loyalty to power (to an authoritative media discourse) and simultaneously experiencing a strong mistrust in it. The ambivalence or co-existence of trust and mistrust show the traditions of the authoritarian system of social life, where fear is in the first place and trust in the last. Our trust is determined by history and culture. Trust is not a constant, it can be viewed as a spectrum of relations or a continuum with several levels. Complete and unconditional (blind) trust is unreasonable. The other extreme is the absolute mistrust in the texts of journalists, a kind of media agnosticism and absenteeism. Without trust, people are forced to resort to informal practices and surrogates, while trust at the institutional level makes the state workable. Institutional trust in the press is a driver of media economics. Mistrust in the public sphere complicates human interaction with organisations, makes it difficult to understand the world and ultimately hinders the development of society. A professional journalistic community should fully understand the risks associated with reducing or losing the trust of the audience. Understanding the threats, the professional community could develop a program to restore the lost trust in the media industry as a whole and in certain types of journalism related to social problems.

Download file
Counter downloads: 94

Keywords

доверие, журналистика, СМИ, коммуникации, аудитория, trust, journalism, mass media, communication, audience

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Ershov Yuriy M.Tomsk State Universityershov@newsman.tsu.ru
Всего: 1

References

Lasswell G.D. Propaganda Technique in the World War. N.Y. Peter Smith. 1938.
Селигмен А. Проблема доверия. M.: Идея-Пресс, 2002.
Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. М.: ACT; Ермак, 2004.
Луман Н. Социальные системы. Очерк общей теории. СПб.: Наука, 2007.
Luhmann N. Trust and Power. Chichester (Engl.). Wiley, 1979.
Гидденс Э. Последствия современности. M.: Праксис, 2011.
Шляхова я Е.В. Социально-психологические факторы доверия пользователей к информации в электронной массовой коммуникации: автореф. дис.. канд. психол. наук. М., 2013.
Короченский А.П. Источники кризиса доверия. Главные причины недоверия к СМИ // Журналистика и медиарынок. 2006. № 12.
Манусян А. Доверие аудитории к СМИ: тенденции // Глобус: аналитический журнал. 2013. № 7.
Ненашева А.В. Журналистика и доверие на современном этапе развития // Гуманитарные научные исследования. 2014. № 12, ч. 1.
Пресса, политика и толерантное поведение: Сборник аналитических материалов научно-практического семинара для журналистов области по проблемам формирования толерантности и профилактике политического экстремизма / под ред. Ю.М.Ершова. Томск, 2002.
Доверие и недоверие в условиях развития гражданского общества / отв. ред. А.Б. Купрейченко, И.В. Мерсиянова. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2013. 564 с.
Паутова Л. Доверие как фактор общественной жизни [Интервью] // Россия будущего: 2017-2035 [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.russia2035.ru/works/pautova-interview.
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. Global Report // Edelman [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://www.edelman.com/global-results.
Интерес к событиям в политике. Какие события политической жизни обсуждают россияне в последнее время // ФОМ. 2017. 29 авг. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://fom.ru/Politika/13668.
Гудков Л. «Мы поняли, что советский человек никуда не уходит» [Интервью] // Левада-Центр. 2017. 24 июля. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://www.levada.ru/2017/07/24/my-ponyali-chto-sovetskij -chelovek-nikuda-ne-uhodit/print/
Ожегов С.И. Толковый словарь русского языка / С.И. Ожегов, Н.Ю. Шведова. М., 1992.
Barthel M., Mitchell A., Holcomb J. Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion // Pew Recearche Center. Journalism & Media. 2016. dec. 15. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.journalism.org/2016/12/15/ many-americans-believe-fake-news-is-sowing-confusion.
Коммуникации. Медиа. Дизайн. 2017. Т. 2. № 1.
 Media as an expert system and an area of trust | Voprosy zhurnalistiki – Russian Journal of Media Studies. 2017. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/26188422/1/2

Media as an expert system and an area of trust | Voprosy zhurnalistiki – Russian Journal of Media Studies. 2017. № 1. DOI: 10.17223/26188422/1/2

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 503