Policy Diffusion: Theory, Concept, Practice | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. № 61. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/61/25

Policy Diffusion: Theory, Concept, Practice

The article discusses the relevant problem of the spread of political innovation in world practice. The main research method is the analysis of publications on the problems of policy diffusion, widely represented in the world and only slightly in Russia. The work aims to review publications on the problems of policy diffusion, analyze theoretical and methodological approaches to its study, assess the current state of research on policy diffusion, determine its promising directions and special factors of the Russian case. The analysis of publications on policy diffusion shows that the focus of the general discussion is on issues of a paradigmatic nature: definition of the concept, research methods, development of theories of policy diffusion, and application of theoretical approaches to the analysis of existing practices. The most elaborated and coordinated in scientific discourse is the concept of policy diffusion, and the most significant problem that needs to be studied is the operationalization of the concept, taking into account the mechanisms of policy dissemination and related implementation practices. The directions of further research are the search for valid and reliable methods of measuring policy diffusion; the conceptualization of its practices; the study of its communicative mechanisms, such as “diffuse networks”; the study of non-institutionalized forms of policy reception. The generalization of the review allowed determining the special conditions for the demand for policy diffusion research in Russia: the maturity of the object of study, i.e., the independence of policy subjects in the choice of development strategies, which is possible only in the context of the further democratization in political governance; and the spread of policy diffusion practices as a result of decentralization in political decision-making. The authorities in Russia always strive to control even the free democratic processes of communication; therefore, mandatory mechanisms of policy diffusion will be of particular importance. As a scientific problem, this can be expressed through the search for the justification of ways to manage political freedoms; these ways assume that public administration goes to a more complex level of interaction with society.

Download file
Counter downloads: 47

Keywords

policy diffusion, political innovation, theory of innovation

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Podshibyakina Tat’yana A.Southern Federal Universitytan5@bk.ru
Всего: 1

References

Гельман В.Я., Ланкина Т.В. Политические диффузии в условиях пространственно гибридного режима. Институциональное строительство и выборы мэров в городах России // Полис. Политические исследования. 2007. №. 6. С. 86-109.
Сунгуров А.Ю. Инновации и их диффузия: к возможности использования концепции в социально-политической сфере //Философские науки. 2010. № 1. С. 15-24.
Сунгуров А.Ю. Как возникают политические инновации: «фабрики мысли» и другие институты-медиаторы. РОССПЭН, 2015. 283.с.
Журавлев А.Н. Диффузия политических нововведений как пространственный процесс : дис.. канд. географ. наук. СПбГУ, 1993.
RogersE.M. Diffusion of innovations. New York : Free Press, 2003. 551 p.
HagerstrandT. Diffusion of innovation as the Arial process. 1954.
Baumgartner F.R., Jack L. Walker Jr. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63 (September): 880 - 99 Cited 482 times // American Political Science Review. 2006. Vol. 100, № 4. P. 672-672.
Walker J.L. The diffusion of innovations among the American states // American political science review. 1969. Vol. 63, № 3. P. 880-899.
Boehmke F.J., Pacheco J. Introduction to SPPQ Special Issue on Policy Diffusion. 2016.
Wasserfallen F. Policy diffusion and European public policy research // The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2018. P. 621633.
Tanja A. Borzel & Thomas Risse. From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction // West European Politics. 2012. 35:1. Р. 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
Tanja A. Borzel & Thomas Risse. When Europeanisation Meets Diffusion: Exploring New Territory // West European Politics. 2012. 35:1. Р. 192-207. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2012.634543
Berry F.S., Berry W.D. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis // American political science review. 1990. Vol. 84, № 2. P. 395-415.
Baybeck B., Berry W.D., Siegel D.A. A strategic theory of policy diffusion via intergovernmental competition // The Journal of Politics. 2011. Vol. 73, № 1. P. 232-247.
Graham E.R., Shipan C.R., Volden C. The communication of ideas across subfields in political science // PS: Political Science & Politics. 2014. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 468-476.
Shipan C.R., Volden C. Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners // Public Administration Review. 2012. Vol. 72, № 6. P. 788-796.
Gilardi F. Four ways we can improve policy diffusion research // State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 2016. Vol. 16, № 1. Р. 8-21.
MaggettiМ. and Gilardi F. Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms // Journal of Public Policy. 2016. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 87-107. Available on CJO 2015. URL: http://www.fabriziogilardi.org/resources/papers/Maggetti-Gilardi-JPP-2015.pdf) (accessed: 22.01.16).
Goertz G. Social Science Concepts. A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2006.
Desmarais B.A., Harden J.J., Boehmke F.J. Persistent policy pathways: Inferring diffusion networks in the American states // American Political Science Review. 2015. Vol. 109, № 2. P. 392406.
Shipan C.R., Volden C. The mechanisms of policy diffusion // American journal of political science. 2008. Vol. 52, № 4. P. 840-857.
Gilardi F. Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies // Handbook of international relations. 2012. Vol. 2. P. 453-477.
Dobbin F., Simmons B., Garrett G. The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? // Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2007. Vol. 33. P. 449-472.
WardH., John P. Competitive learning in yardstick competition: Testing models of policy diffusion with performance data // Political Science Research and Methods. 2013. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 3-25.
Zhou S. et al. Understanding renewable energy policy adoption and evolution in Europe: The impact of coercion, normative emulation, competition, and learning // Energy Research & Social Science. 2019. Vol. 51. P. 1-11.
Karch A. Emerging issues and future directions in state policy diffusion research // State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 54-80.
Karch A. Vertical diffusion and the policy-making process: The politics of embryonic stem cell research // Political Research Quarterly. 2012. Vol. 65, № 1. P. 48-61.
Lucas A. Public policy diffusion research: Integrating analytic paradigms // Knowledge. 1983. Vol. 4, № 3. P. 379-408.
Desmarais B.A., Harden J.J., Boehmke F.J. Persistent policy pathways: Inferring diffusion networks in the American states // American Political Science Review. 2015. Vol. 109, № 2. P. 392406.
Gray V. Innovation in the states: A diffusion study // American political science review. 1973. Vol. 67, № 4. P. 1174-1185.
Mintrom M., Vergari S. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms // The Journal of Politics. 1998. Vol. 60, № 1. P. 126-148.
Garrett K.N., Jansa J.M. Interest group influence in policy diffusion networks // State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 15,№ 3. P. 387-417.
Butler D.M. et al. Ideology, learning, and policy diffusion: Experimental evidence // American Journal of Political Science. 2017. Vol. 61, № 1. P. 37-49.
Volden C., Ting M.M., Carpenter D.P. A formal model of learning and policy diffusion // American Political Science Review. 2008. Vol. 102, № 3. P. 319-332.
Cruz-Aceves V.D., Mallinson D.J. Clarifying the Measurement of Relative Ideology in Policy Diffusion Research // State and Local Government Review. 2020. С. 0160323X20902818.
Grossback, Lawrence J., Sean Nicholson-Crotty, and David AM Peterson. Ideology and learning in policy diffusion // American Politics Research. 2004. Vol. 32, issue 5. P. 521-545.
Zaller J.R. Diffusion of political attitudes //Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. Vol. 53, № 5. P. 821.
 Policy Diffusion: Theory, Concept, Practice | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. № 61. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/61/25

Policy Diffusion: Theory, Concept, Practice | Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021. № 61. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/61/25

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 1056