Determination of the radius of triple junctions of tilt boundaries in nickel: a molecular dynamics modeling | Izvestiya vuzov. Fizika. 2019. № 4. DOI: 10.17223/00213411/62/4/109

Determination of the radius of triple junctions of tilt boundaries in nickel: a molecular dynamics modeling

The distribution of free volume and energy in the region of triple junctions of high-angle tilt boundaries with the axes of misorientation <100> and <111> in nickel, formed during crystallization, was studied by the method of molecular dynamics. The crystallization was simulated from three crystal nuclei with a variable value of free volume. It is shown that the introduced free volume in the process of crystallization concentrates mainly in the region of the grain boundaries, wherein, the closer to the junction of the boundaries, the higher the proportion of free volume. The effective radius of triple junctions was determined from the distribution of energy in its region. At the <100> tilt boundaries and the junctions formed by them, the free volume during crystallization dissipates more efficiently than at the junctions formed by the <111> boundaries. For this reason, the energy radius of the triple junction of the <100> boundaries varied slightly with an increase in the introduced free volume: from 5 to 7 Å, whereas the junction radius of the <111> boundaries with the introduction of 2% of vacancies in the starting computational cell reached 14 Å.

Download file

Counter downloads: 120

Keywords

free volume, tilt boundary, grain boundary, triple junction, molecular dynamics, свободный объем, граница зерен, граница наклона, тройной стык, молекулярная динамика

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
Poletaev G.M.	I.I. Polzunov Altai State Technical University	gmpoletaev@mail.ru
Starostenkov M.D.	I.I. Polzunov Altai State Technical University	genphys@mail.ru
Rakitin R.Y.	Altai State University	movehell@gmail.com
Tsellermaer V.Y.	Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service	gmpoletaev@mail.ru
Iliina M.A.	Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation	mailina@fa.ru

Всего: 5

References

Yang C.C., Rollett A.D., and Mullins W.W. // Scripta Mater. - 2001. - V. 44. - P. 2735-2740.

Perevalova O.B., Konovalova E.V., Koneva N.A., and Kozlov E.V. // J. Mater. Sci. Technol. - 2003. - V. 19. - No. 6. - P. 593-596.

Fortes M.A. and Deus A.M. // Mater. Sci. Forum. - 2004. - V. 455-456. - P. 648-652.

Poletaev G.M., Zorya I.V., Starostenkov M.D., et al. // J. Exp. Theor. Phys. - 2019. - V. 128. - No. 1. - P. 88-93.

Полетаев Г.М., Дмитриенко Д.В., Старостенков М.Д. // Фундаментальные проблемы современного материаловедения. - 2012. - Т. 9. - № 3. - C. 344-348.

Полетаев Г.М., Зоря И.В., Старостенков М.Д. и др. // Изв. вузов. Физика. - 2018. - Т. 61. - № 7. - C. 47-51.

Poletaev G., Zorya I., and Rakitin R. // Computat. Mater. Sci. - 2018. - V. 148. - P. 184-189.

Кулабухова Н.А., Полетаев Г.М., Старостенков М.Д. и др. // Изв. вузов. Физика. - 2011. - Т. 54. - № 12. - С. 86-91.

Poletaev G.M., Novoselova D.V., Zorya I.V., and Starostenkov M.D. // Phys. Solid State. - 2018. - V. 60. - No. 5. - P. 847-851.

Cleri F. and Rosato V. // Phys. Rev. B. - 1993. - V. 48. - No. 1. - P. 22-33.

Poletaev G.M., Novoselova D.V., and Kaygorodova V.M. // Solid State Phenom. - 2016. - V. 249. - P. 3-8.

Adlakha I. and Solanki K.N. // Sci. Rep. - 2015. - V. 5. - P. 8692.

Poletaev G.M., Dmitrienko D.V., Diabdenkov V.V., et al. // Phys. Solid State. - 2013. - V. 55. - No. 9. - P. 1920-1924.

Frolov T. and Mishin Y. // Phys. Rev. B. - 2009. - V. 79. - P. 174110.

Rodriguez P., Sundararaman D., Divakar R., and Raghunathan V.S. // Chemistry for Sustainable Development. - 2000. - V. 8. - P. 69-72.

Wegner M., Leuthold J., Peterlechner M., et al. // J. Appl. Phys. - 2014. - V. 116. - P. 093514.

Гуткин М.Ю., Овидько И.А. // Успехи механики. - 2003. - № 1. - С. 68-125.

Palumbo G. and Aust K.T. // Scripta Metallurg. Mater. - 1990. - V. 24. - P. 1771-1776.