Translational X-ray tomographic approach for scanning in limited conditions
In this work, we propose the approach for tomographic measurements to fulfill reconstruction requirements in limited conditions. A simple test phantom and famous Shepp-Logan phantom were used to conduct computer simulations of presenting approach. The reconstruction procedure was applied for the standard rotational, translational and combined trajectory of tomographic scanning. The advantages of the proposed combined scanning trajectory were demonstrated in comparing with the standard tomographic measurement procedure. The reconstruction quality was described as a function of the number of angular and translational positions, which should be defined individually for each type of samples. We hope that the proposed approach can become to fundamental base for the developing new type of industrial non-destructive testing X-ray setups.
Keywords
рентгеновская томография,
алгоритм обратного проецирования,
траектория томографического сканирования,
неразрушающий контроль,
X-ray tomography,
backprojection algorithm,
tomographic scanning trajectory,
non-destructive inspectionAuthors
| Ozdiev A.H. | National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University | ozdiev@tpu.ru |
| Lazarev S.V. | National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University | dr.s.lazarev@gmail.com |
Всего: 2
References
Hiller J., Maisl M., and Reindl L.M. // Meas. Sci. Technol. - 2012. - V. 23. - P. 085404.
Zhao G. and Qin S. // Sensors. - Switzerland, 2018. - V. 18. DOI: 10.3390/s18082524.
Sperrin M. and Winder J. // Scientific Basis of the Royal College of Radiologists Fellowship. - IOP Publishing, 2014. - P. 2-1 to 2-50. DOI: 10.1088/978-0-7503-1058-1ch2.
Fu J., Wang J., Guo W., and Peng P. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. - 2018. - V. 888. - P. 119-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima. 2018.01.044. 158.
Sperrin M., Christoph S., Volker H., et al. // 8th Conf. on Industrial Computed Tomography. - 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TNS.1974.6499235.
Vidovszky I. // Creative Construction Conf., CCC 2017, 19-22 June 2017. - Primosten, Croatia, 2017. - V. 196. - P. 181-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.189.
Agrawal A., Sarkar P., Kashyap Y., et al. // J. Nondestruct. Eval. - 2016. - V. 35. - P. 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10921-016-0353-9.
Cervantes G.A. // Technical Fundamentals of Radiology and CT. - IOP Publishing, 2016. - P. 1-1 to 1-5. DOI: 10.1088/978-0-7503-1212-7ch1.
Herman G.T. Computer Graphics Companion. - Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press Ltd., 2002. - Chapter Computerized Tomography. - P. 192-197.
Browne Michael. Physics for Engineering and Science. - 2nd ed. - McGraw-Hill/Schaum, 2010. - Chapter 36. - P. 382.
Ozdiev A.H. // Trans. Tech. Publications. - 2017. - V. 743. Key Engineering Materials. - P. 445-448. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.743.445.
Ozdiev A.H., Afornu B.K., and Sednev D.A. // Res. Nondestruct. Eval. - 2019. - V. 30. - No. 3. - P. 179-187. DOI: 10.1080/09349847.2018.1498960.
Schön T., Fuchs T., Hanke R., and Dremel K. // Med. Phys. - 2013. - V. 40. - No. 8. - P. 081922.
Shepp L.A. and Logan B.F. // IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. - 1974. - V. 21. - P. 21-43. DOI: 10.1109/TNS. 1974.6499235.
Titarenko V. // IEEE Signal Proc. Lett. - 2016. - V. 23. - P. 800-804. DOI:10.1109/LSP.2016.2554363.
Pelt D.M. and Parkinson D.Y. // Meas. Sci. Technol. - 2018. - V. 29. - P. 034002.
