Electron beam induced transformations of phenol in water in the presence of humic substances | Izvestiya vuzov. Fizika. 2025. № 5. DOI: 10.17223/00213411/68/5/9

Electron beam induced transformations of phenol in water in the presence of humic substances

Electron beams of a RADAN-type pulse accelerator with an average energy of 170 keV and a pulsed cathodoluminescence spectrum meter in the range from 350 to 900 nm, as well as the recording of absorption and fluorescence spectra were used to study the transformation of phenol in water in the presence of humic substances. With the help of this beam, cathodoluminescence excitation and radiolysis action on an aqueous solution of phenol were simultaneously carried out. The degree of transformation of the studied substances was determined by analyzing the luminescence and absorption spectra of the irradiated solution. A study of the effect of a pulsed electron beam on an aqueous solution of phenol in the presence of humic substances showed that the efficiency of phenol transformation in the presence of a sample of a mixture of humic and fulvic acids increases by 2.6 times compared to an aqueous solution.

Download file

Counter downloads: 2

Keywords

phenol, humic acid, electron beam, cathodoluminescence, transformation

Authors

Name	Organization	E-mail
Tchaikovskaya Olga N.	Institute of Electrophysics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State University	tchon@phys.tsu.ru
Bocharnikova Elena N.	Institute of Electrophysics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Tomsk State University	bocharnikova.2010@mail.ru
Solomonov Vladimir I.	Institute of Electrophysics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences	solomonov@iep.uran.ru
Makarova Anna S.	Institute of Electrophysics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences	anniebubnova@mail.ru
Spirina Alfiya V.	Institute of Electrophysics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences	rasuleva@iep.uran.ru
Сhaikovsky Stanislav A.	Institute of Electrophysics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences	chaikovsky@iep.uran.ru
Sokolova Irina V.	Tomsk State University	sokolova@phys.tsu.ru

Всего: 7

References

Qiu Z., Li C.-J. // Chem. Rev. - 2020. - V. 120. - No. 18. - P. 10454-10515.

Yan J., Meng Q., Shen X., et al. // Sci. Adv. - 2020. - V. 6. - No. 45. - Art. eabd1951.

Харлампович Г.Д., Чуркин Ю.В. Фенолы. - М.: Химия, 1974. - 376 с.

Gu Z., Zhang Z., Ni N., et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. - 2022. - V. 56. - No. 7. - P. 4356-4366.

Chen C., Wu Z., Zheng S., et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. - 2020. - V. 54. - No. l3. - P. 8455-8463.

Magdy M., Alarm M.G., El-Etriby H.K. // J. Cleaner Production. - 2021. - V. 291. - Art. 125923.

Samartzis N., Athanasiou M., Dracopoulos V., et al. // Chem. Eng. J. - 2022. - V. 430. - No. 4. - Art. 133179.

Li C.-X., Chen C.-B., Wang Y.-J., et al. // Chem. Eng. J. - 2019. - V. 362. - P. 570-575.

Busca G., Berardinelli S., Resini C., Arrighi L. // J. Hazardous Mater. - 2008. - V. 160. - No. 2-3. - P. 265-288.

Безлепкина Н.П., Чайковская О.Н., Бочарникова Е.Н. и др. // Изв. вузов. Физика. - 2024. - Т. 67. - № 4. - С. 73-83.

Solomonov V.I., Michailov S.G., Lipchak A.I., et al. // Laser Phys. - 2006. - V. 16. - P. 126-129.

Mesyats G.A., Novoselov Yu.N., Filatov I.E. // Tech. Phys. Lett. - 2001. - V. 27. - P. 813-815.

Nguyen T.T., Uthairatanakij A., Srilaong V., et al. // Appl. Biol. Chem. - 2021. - V. 64. - No. 1. - Art. 19.

Villarreal-Lozoya J.E., Lombardini L., Cisneros-Zevallos L. // J. Agric. Food Chem. -2009. - V. 57. - Art. 10732.

Gul M.M., Ahmad K.S. // J. Mater. Sci. - 2022. - V. 57. - Art. 7290.

Elias M.I., Madureira J., Santos P.M.P., et al. // Innovative Food Sci. Emerging Technol. - 2020. - V. 66. - Art. 102487.

Орлов Д.С. // Почвоведение. - 1998. - № 9. - С. 1049-1057.

Русьянова Н.Д. Углехимия: монография. - М.: Наука, 2003. - 317 с.

Майоров Ф.А., Мешалкин Ю.П., Политова Ю.А. // Оптика атмосферы и океана. - 2000. - Т. 13. - № 10. - С. 914.

Другов Ю.С. Мониторинг органических загрязнений природной среды. 500 методик: практическое руководство. - М.: Бином, 2009. - 893 с.

Pikaev А.К., Bludenko А.V., Makarov I.Е., et al. // Radiat. Phys. Сhеm. - 1996. - V. 48. - No. l. - P. 75-80.

Han B., Kim D.K., Pikaev A.K. // IAEA. - 1998. - P. 339-345.

Зыкова М.В. Методология комплексного исследования высокомолекулярных соединений гуминовой природы: дисс. … д-ра фарм. наук / М. В. Зыкова. - Томск, 2018. - 384 с.

Селянина С.Б., Зубов И.Н., Орлов А.С. и др. // Успехи современного естествознания. - 2024. - № 1. - С. 41-46.

Tchaikovskaya O.N., Solomonov V.I., Bocharnikova E.N., et al. // IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. - 2023. - V. 61. - Art. 2765.

Solomonov V.I., Spirina A.V., Popov M.P., Kaigorodova O.A. // J. Opt. Technol. - 2016. - V. 83. - P. 494-497.

Соколова И.В., Чайковская О.Н. // Оптика атмосферы и океана. - 2006. - Т. 19. - № 2-3. - С. 244-247.

Kulovaara M., Corin N., Backlund P., Tervo J. // Chemosphere. - 1996. - V. 33. - P. 783-790.

Ванцкявичуте Е.П. // Изв. вузов. Физика. - 2005. - Т. 48. - № 6. - С. 71-72.

Uyguner C.S., Bekbolet M. // Catal. Today. - 2005. - V. 101. - No. 3-4. - P. 267-274.

Traina S.J., Novak J., Smeck N.E. // J. Environ. Quality. - 1990. - V. 19. - No. 1. - P. 151-153.

O'Loughlin E., Chin Y.-P. // Water Res. - 2001. - V. 35. - No. 1. - P. 333-338.

Chin Y.P., Aiken G., O’Loughlin E. // Environ. Sci. Technol. - 1994. - V. 28. - No. 11. - P. 1853-1858.

Peuravuori J., Pihlaja K. // Anal. Chimica Acta. - 1997. - V. 337. - No. 2. - P. 133-149.

Lipski M., Stawinski J., Zych D. // J. Fluorescence. - 1999. - V. 9. - P. 133-138.

Соколова И.В., Чайковская О.Н. // Вестник ТГПУ. - 2008. - T. 4. - № 78. - C. 42-46.

Canonica S., Jans U., Stemmler K., Hoigne J. // Environ. Sci. Technol. - 1995. - V. 29. - No. 7. - P. 1822-1831.

Canonica S., Freiburghaus M. // Environ. Sci. Technol. - 2001. - V. 35. - No. 4. - P. 690-695.

Halladja S., Ter Halle A., Aguer J.-P., et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. - 2007. - V. 41. - No. 17. - Art. 6066.