Areas of scaling of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of manufacturing in the implementation of government support measures | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2025. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/70/15

Areas of scaling of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of manufacturing in the implementation of government support measures

Substantiation of the directions of development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector when they receive government support measures is an urgent scientific problem in the context of sustained government interest in this sector of the national economy. The aim of the study is to identify the presence or absence of a relationship between the resulting performance indicators of SMEs in the manufacturing sector and the government support measures implemented within the framework of the national project in 2019-2023. The object of the study is small and medium-sized enterprises in the Russian Federation engaged in activities related to section C "Manufacturing", corresponding to codes 10 to 33 in accordance with the AllRussian Classifier of Economic Activities (OKVED). Within the framework of the analysis, SME entities are structured into three groups - microenterprises, small enterprises and medium-sized enterprises, in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. To achieve this research aim, the authors develop and substantiate the sequence and substantive characteristics of the stages of the diagnostic methodology for assessing the scaling potential of SMEs in the manufacturing sector when implementing government support measures. The authors used the methods of chronological analysis and statistical data processing as research methods, as well as the method of correlation analysis to test the author's hypotheses on assessing the impact of government support parameters on 7 resulting indicators of SME activity in the manufacturing sector. The results revealed the multidirectional impact of government support measures and made it possible to justify the need for their differentiation, which served as the basis for forming a profile of the scaling potential of SMEs and developing a matrix of design solutions for synthesizing types and directions of government support measures for SMEs in the manufacturing sector. The practical significance of the research lies in the possibility of applying the author's conclusions in the formation of state and sectoral programs for the support of business entities by the executive authorities of the Russian Federation and development institutions at various levels of government. Based on the research results, the authors see the need to develop a matrix of design solutions for synthesizing various types and directions of government support measures for SMEs in the manufacturing sector, broken down into micro, small and medium-sized enterprises by their categories, which allows them to be more differentiated by types and directions of support in order to enhance the scaling potential of SMEs. The scientific novelty of the research conducted by the authors lies in the development of theoretical and methodological approaches to substantiate the scaling directions of small and medium-sized enterprises in the manufacturing sector when implementing state support measures and identifying problem areas on this basis that require prompt response and adjustment when determining the vector of support in general. The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Download file
Counter downloads: 1

Keywords

scaling, small and medium-sized enterprises, business entities, government support measures, resulting performance indicators, manufacturing, strategic management

Authors

NameOrganizationE-mail
Sheina Ekaterina G.Ural State University of Economicsapla@usue.ru
Plakhin Andrey E.Ural State University of Economicssheinaeg@usue.ru
Всего: 2

References

Нехода Е.В., Краковецкая И.В., Каз М.С., Редчикова Н.А., Усманова Д.К. Подходы к оценке реализации устойчивых практик бизнеса в условиях эволюции концепции устойчивого развития // Креативная экономика. 2023. Т. 17, № 7. С. 2381-2396.
Крюков В.А., Крюков Я.В. Новая индустриализация - в основе синергия науки, инноваций и пространственных особенностей // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2024. Т. 248, № 4. С. 158-172.
Иванов С.Л., Теребова С.В. Проблемы развития инновационного предпринимательства в регионе и пути их решения // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2024. Т. 17, № 1. C. 159-177.
Radicic D., Djalilov K. The impact of technological and non-technological innovations on export intensity in SMEs // Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2019. № 26 (4). P. 612-638.
Mostafiz Md.I., Hughes M., Gali N., Sambasivan M. The context sensitivity of international entrepreneurial orientation and the role of process and product innovation capabilities // British journal of management. 2022. № 34 (4). P. 2015-20з5.
Леонтьева Л.С., Голубцов И.А Региональные инициативы по государственной поддержке малого и среднего предпринимательства в Российской Федерации // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 21: Управление (государство и общество). 2024. Т. 21, № 2. С. 93-108.
Rani R., Kumar N. The dynamics of link between entrepreneurship, government support and economic growth: Evidence from BRICS countries // Journal of Public Affairs. 2022. № 22. S1. e2741.
Ye P., Cai W., Zhou Y. Can green industrial policy promote the total factor productivity of manufacturing enterprises? // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022. Vol. 29, № 58. P. 88041-88054.
Найденова Ю.Н., Паршаков П.А., Смирнов А.О. Детерминанты получения государственной поддержки малыми и средними предприятиями в России // Управленец. 2024. Т. 15, № 5. С. 22-37.
Clayton P. Different outcomes for different founders? Local organizational sponsorship and entrepreneurial finance // Small business economics. 2024. № 62 (1). P. 23-62.
Bessonova E. Firms’ efficiency, exits and government procurement contracts // European Journal of Political Economy. 2023. № 76 (11). Р. 102253.
Баранова Е.И., Юданов А.Ю. Стилизованный цикл жизни быстрорастущих фирм в России // Вопросы экономики. 2022. № 3. С. 77-97.
Aldaas A. The effect of firm life cycle on profitability: Evidence from Jordanian firms // Management Science Letters. 2021. № 11. P. 1919-1926.
Крюков В.А. Торговля «воздухом» - забота общая, подходы разные // ЭКО. 2025. № 1 (600). С. 4-7.
Широкова Е.Ю., Лукин Е.В. Производственный сектор экономики Северо-Запада России: продолжение трансформации? // Проблемы развития территории. 2024. Т. 28, № 4. С. 10-29.
Криничанский К.В., Юревич М.А., Фатькин А.В. Связь финансов и роста в России: работает ли канал малого и среднего предпринимательства? // Вопросы экономики. 2023. № 6. С. 76-93.
Yeqiang Xu., Sarinova A., Sarinova A., Lozhnikova A.V. Approaches to measuring average and median wages in Russia and abroad: data sources and users // Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2023. № 62. С. 19-31.
Рощина И.В., Нехода Е.В. Ценностные ориентиры россиян «третьего возраста» на рынке труда // Экономика труда. 2023. Т. 10, № 12. С. 1915-1930.
Ложникова А.В., Куделина О.В. Массовая собственность работников компаний в контексте поиска путей «великой перезагрузки» капитализма // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2022. Т. 13, № 3. С. 532-546.
 Areas of scaling of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of manufacturing in the implementation of government support measures | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2025. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/70/15

Areas of scaling of small and medium-sized enterprises in the field of manufacturing in the implementation of government support measures | Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika – Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2025. № 70. DOI: 10.17223/19988648/70/15

Download full-text version
Counter downloads: 186